Scores
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
Back to front
Bengals’ defensive makeover starts with Dexter Lawrence, but they rank 29th in one NFL defensive trio exercise
The Apex Times

THE APEX TIMES

Sports/The Apex Times/Jun 9, 7:27 AM EDT

Bengals’ defensive makeover starts with Dexter Lawrence, but they rank 29th in one NFL defensive trio exercise

A Sports Illustrated defensive “triplets” ranking slots Cincinnati at No. 29 by combining a pass rusher, an inside linebacker, and a defensive back. The number suggests the Bengals’ depth and coverage questions may outweigh the impact of their latest defensive addition.

The Cincinnati Bengals have added Dexter Lawrence to their defense, a move that targets interior disruption and helps carry pressure for the rest of the unit. But in one of the NFL offseason’s more stylized assessments, Cincinnati’s overall defensive grouping still landed near the bottom. In a ranking published by Sports Illustrated and cited widely in early June coverage, the Bengals were placed 29th in the league in defensive “triplets,” a framework that pairs three specific roles on each team: a pass rusher, an inside linebacker, and a defensive back.

The methodology matters because it can penalize teams with a positional mismatch, even if they have one or two standout players elsewhere. In the Bengals’ case, the ranking listed Lawrence along with Demetrius Knight Jr. and Dax Hill as the trio responsible for the team’s 29th-place placement. Lawrence’s reputation as a high-end defensive interior force was acknowledged in the analysis, but the remaining two pieces did not elevate Cincinnati into the upper tier of the league’s options.

The same ranking placed the Los Angeles Rams first overall after their own roster additions. Los Angeles was credited with Myles Garrett as its pass-rush centerpiece, paired with Nate Landman at inside linebacker and Trent McDuffie as the defensive back. The Rams’ leap is presented less as a single-player upgrade and more as a whole-group alignment, because the triplets model rewards continuity across all three required roles.

Across the AFC North, the Bengals’ neighbors were portrayed as having stronger or more coherent three-part combinations in the same exercise. The Steelers were ranked 11th, built around T.J. Watt, Patrick Queen, and Jamel Dean, while the Ravens checked in at 10th with Trey Hendrickson plus Roquan Smith and Kyle Hamilton. Those placements framed Cincinnati as an organization still searching for the balance between pressure creation, middle-of-the-field stopping power, and defensive-back play.

The ranking also included an important caveat: Cincinnati might look better if the evaluation were limited to defensive linemen only. The analysis suggested that the team’s biggest hurdles were concentrated away from the trenches, pointing to concerns at off-ball linebacker and throughout the secondary. Lawrence’s arrival, in that view, could still provide meaningful relief for the front’s burden, but the overall trio score would not move dramatically until the inside linebacker and defensive back components stabilize.

For Cincinnati, that distinction is likely to be felt during camp and the early part of the preseason, when coordinators have to decide how to manage matchups against quarterbacks who test the middle and push underneath coverage. Even if Lawrence’s presence strengthens run defense and interior push, the Bengals are still evaluated on whether their inside linebacker alignment can consistently fit gaps and whether the defensive back group can turn early reads into low-variance plays.

The triplets ranking is ultimately an offseason narrative tool, not a statistic derived from a full season of snaps. Still, it offers a concentrated lens on roster construction. If Cincinnati wants to climb from 29th, the offseason priority becomes clear: Lawrence may move the needle inside, but the Bengals’ ceiling in this particular framework will depend on how Knight and Hill grade out when the league’s offense patterns are built to stress the seams and the deep-to-short passing lanes.

For fans and analysts watching the Bengals in training camp, the question is whether Lawrence’s addition changes the unit’s identity enough to prevent the back end and inside coverage from absorbing the same pressure they would have without him. If the answer is yes, Cincinnati could begin the season with a more coherent defensive structure, even as preseason assessments and positional rankings continue to vary from outlet to outlet.

Why It Matters

  • Rankings built on role groupings highlight whether roster additions address team needs in more than one area.
  • Cincinnati’s defensive identity, especially in coverage and middle-of-the-field stopping, remains a focal point alongside its interior line upgrade.
  • The Bengals’ path relative to division rivals can be understood through how their “required roles” compare with the Steelers and Ravens.
  • The Lawrence addition may reduce the pressure on the defense overall, but this ranking suggests it does not automatically solve all mismatch problems.

Sources

Key Facts

  • Sports Illustrated used a defensive “triplets” framework that assigns one pass-rusher, one inside linebacker, and one defensive back to rank all 32 NFL teams.
  • Cincinnati was placed 29th, with the Bengals’ triplets listed as Dexter Lawrence, Demetrius Knight Jr., and Dax Hill.
  • The Los Angeles Rams were ranked first in the same exercise, built around Myles Garrett, Nate Landman, and Trent McDuffie.
  • In the AFC North portion of the ranking, the Steelers were slotted at 11th and the Ravens at 10th.
  • The Bengals’ placement was described as being held back by issues beyond the defensive line, particularly off-ball linebacker play and throughout the secondary.