Scores
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
SportsNextScores and schedulesUpdating
Back to front
Big 12’s revenue boom arrives, but the richest payouts still lag
The Apex Times

THE APEX TIMES

Sports/The Apex Times/Jun 8, 3:27 PM EDT

Big 12’s revenue boom arrives, but the richest payouts still lag

Even as the conference’s top-line numbers hit new highs, the mix of expansion dilution, conference expenses, and realignment financing means member schools are not getting SEC-style riches all at once.

The Big 12 is taking in more money than ever, but that does not automatically translate into every school suddenly becoming richer, at least not in the early years of this new conference footprint. For the 2024-25 sports season, the Big 12 reported $610.9 million in revenue in federal tax filings, a record figure that still sits below the Big Ten and SEC in overall scale. The same filings period is one more reminder that the conference’s “more” is being filtered through a distribution model built for stability after realignment, not a blank check for every athletic budget at the same moment.

To understand why, you have to start with what the Big 12 built when its old foundation was disrupted. After major programs announced departures for the SEC, the conference added BYU, UCF, Cincinnati, and Houston, with the league later emphasizing that the goal was to “strengthen and stabilize” the conference. The Big 12 officially welcomed the four schools as a 14-team league effective July 1, 2023, creating immediate brand value and national recruiting access for a footprint that had to rebuild its media and postseason positioning under pressure.

The conference’s financial story includes a payoff, just not an even one. In 2023-24, the Big 12 announced it would distribute a record $470 million, and it acknowledged “some dilution” tied to adding the newcomers. The Kansas City Star reported that the new schools each received $18 million in that year, while the original members saw their shares reduced as the league phased in the new arrivals. The expectation was that full shares would arrive later, with the same reporting pointing to the start of 2025-26 full distributions at a projected level of about $50 million per school.

Where the “why isn’t anyone richer” question sharpens is what sits between revenue and distribution. A separate report on UCF’s first season in the Big 12 said the conference distributed $475.997 million to 14 member institutions, with UCF receiving $20.80 million, BYU $20.67 million, Cincinnati $19.88 million, and Houston $19.57 million. That same reporting put Big 12 expenses at $530.72 million during the last fiscal year, noting that most of those costs covered conference distributions. In other words, the Big 12’s top-line growth is being largely consumed by the conference’s own financial machinery, even before schools consider what their own departments still owe for operations, coaching, facilities, and debt.

Realignment also mattered for timing. The Big 12’s revenue-sharing system did not operate in isolation while Texas and Oklahoma were on an early-SEC timetable. Sports Business Journal reported that parts of the revenue-share cuts tied to the 2023-24 cycle were used to finance payments promised to the four schools that joined in the summer, affecting how quickly continuing members could receive full value. That kind of redistribution is the opposite of a windfall, even if the conference is simultaneously posting record numbers elsewhere.

There is also the simple competitive gap. WTOP, citing AP reporting, said Big 12 and ACC revenues were record-setting for 2024-25 but continued to lag behind the Big Ten and SEC, which both crossed $1 billion in total revenue. WTOP also noted that the Big Ten’s average full-share payout was about $79.9 million, while the SEC’s came in near $72.4 million. Against that backdrop, the Big 12’s expanding distributions can look impressive locally, yet still feel modest nationally for schools trying to close the talent-and-facilities gap.

What to watch next is whether the Big 12’s projected “catch-up” actually materializes once more schools move into full revenue-share status and once the conference’s larger media-rights era fully kicks in. For BYU, UCF, Cincinnati, and Houston, the immediate question is how much of the gap closes between partial shares now and full shares beginning in 2025-26. For the rest of the league, the question is whether the record distribution totals keep climbing without new layers of dilution, especially as postseason performance and College Football Playoff participation continue to influence the size of the pools.

keyFacts:

keyFacts

Why It Matters

  • Revenue growth without immediate “richer” payouts can affect how quickly Big 12 programs can match the SEC and Big Ten on staff investment, facilities, and NIL strategy.
  • Phased-in revenue shares mean expansion brands like BYU, UCF, Cincinnati, and Houston may keep feeling like they are building toward peak financial footing rather than receiving it immediately.
  • If conference expenses rise in step with revenue, the competitive gap may narrow slower than topline revenue announcements suggest.
  • A league’s financial model influences roster stability and recruiting momentum, especially when programs are trying to reduce the time it takes to close talent gaps.
  • For the Big 12 title picture, the distribution pool’s sensitivity to football’s biggest postseason moments keeps making on-field performance a direct financial variable.

Sources

Key Facts

  • For 2024-25, the Big 12 reported $610.9 million in revenue in its federal tax filings, a record figure.
  • In 2023-24, the Big 12 announced a record $470 million distribution, while saying adding Houston, Cincinnati, BYU, and UCF created “some dilution.”
  • The Kansas City Star reported that the new schools each received $18 million in 2023-24 and were scheduled to receive higher amounts the next year, with full shares expected to start in 2025-26 at about $50 million per school.
  • A report on UCF’s first Big 12 season said the conference distributed $475.997 million to 14 institutions, with UCF at $20.80 million, BYU at $20.67 million, Cincinnati at $19.88 million, and Houston at $19.57 million.
  • That same reporting put Big 12 expenses at $530.72 million during the last fiscal year, suggesting the conference’s spending largely absorbs the incremental revenue growth.
  • WTOP reported that the Big Ten and SEC crossed $1 billion in total revenue for the same 2024-25 season, with higher average payouts than the Big 12’s.
  • Sports Business Journal reported that parts of Big 12 revenue-share cuts in the 2023-24 cycle were tied to financing payments promised to the four new schools.