THE APEX TIMES
In comments flagged by markets coverage, hedge-fund investor Steve Eisman said the U.S. wireless “big three” are no longer attractive investments, arguing the industry faces disruption from Elon Musk’s push into the wireless market via SpaceX plans.
Steve Eisman, the hedge-fund investor who helped cement his reputation through the book and film “Big Short,” said he believes the three largest U.S. wireless carriers are “uninvestable.” In remarks highlighted in markets coverage on Nov. 9, Eisman grouped AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile as carriers whose risk-reward profile no longer justifies fresh capital.
Eisman’s comments arrive at a time when attention in telecommunications has shifted toward potential new competitive pressure. The markets report tied his skepticism directly to Elon Musk’s stated intent to target the U.S. wireless market, referencing SpaceX as the vehicle for the challenge.
The remarks suggest Eisman expects the carriers’ core economics to remain under pressure, rather than improve enough to make them attractive to an investor focused on forward-looking returns. While the coverage did not lay out a detailed thesis, the framing was clear: the “big three” are, in his view, facing structural headwinds that change how investors should think about the sector.
For AT&T specifically, the company remains one of the country’s dominant mobile network operators, but the markets commentary presented a harsher valuation view. Eisman’s term, “uninvestable,” implies that even if the companies continue to operate at scale, he does not believe their business models offer a compelling path to superior returns.
AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile compete for customers using high-capacity spectrum, extensive network infrastructure, and long-running subscriber acquisition and retention strategies. Such competition has historically driven price and plan innovation, but it can also narrow margins when costs remain elevated and customer growth is harder to sustain.
The markets piece did not cite a specific metric, valuation multiple, or earnings projection in support of Eisman’s view. It also did not specify whether his assessment reflected concerns about capital spending needs, pricing pressure, or the pace at which a new entrant could erode incumbents’ market power.
Eisman also did not describe, in the coverage referenced, how quickly Musk’s wireless ambitions might translate into measurable consumer impact, nor whether investors should expect near-term disruption or a longer-term shift. That uncertainty matters because telecom investment cases often turn on timing: when incremental competitive effects show up can change how investors price future cash flows.
What to watch next is whether telecom carriers publicly address the prospect of satellite-linked wireless competition in the way investors can underwrite. Investors will also look for any clearer articulation of how new service concepts could affect churn, pricing, network buildout plans, and capital allocation decisions at AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile, as well as any credible timelines for how a challenger could scale in the U.S. market.
A sharp selloff following Intel’s third-quarter results has drawn renewed attention to Intel’s cap-structure and the government’s role as a major shareholder, turning Wall Street frustration into a broader political question about public exposure to corporate performance.
As Google rolls out additional TPU options aimed at generative AI workloads, Nvidia is likely to be judged on whether its hardware, software stack, and supply can keep winning in data centers amid heightened leadership attention.
A CNN report circulated through markets on Monday, tying a probe involving Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang to allegations of a personal relationship with an alleged Chinese spy. The company’s disclosure, timing, and the scope of any investigation were not addressed in the report.
After an earnings update, Advanced Micro Devices said growth is continuing and voiced optimism for the fourth quarter, even as market attention has shifted toward concerns that the so-called AI trade is cooling.
The company is preparing a reduction of about 5% of jobs in its Commercial Airplanes division, according to a report, citing ongoing production challenges.
A new market commentary argues that the next wave of “autonomy” spending in defense may be flowing toward Shield AI, even as Palantir remains a prominent software name in military analytics.
A Yahoo Finance report says Jensen Huang’s personal ties could put Nvidia under greater scrutiny in an era where U.S. national-security concerns increasingly intersect with advanced chip supply chains.
A sharp selloff in Alphabet’s stock has erased nearly $500 billion in market value, reflecting investor skepticism about how quickly heavy AI spending will translate into profits.
Market watchers pointed to heavier-than-usual put option volume in Walmart shares as the retailer prepares to report results next week, a move that can reflect hedging or downside speculation rather than a clear directional bet.
Berkshire Hathaway repurchased $9.6 billion of its shares in the third quarter, including $3.4 billion of Class A stock, according to a Yahoo Finance report that suggests some of the A shares were acquired directly from holders.
Comments
Community guidelines. Comments may be removed for violations.
Loading comments...