Civil rights groups and researchers urge federal agency to keep annual workforce demographic data collection

A coalition of researchers and civil rights advocates told a federal agency at a public hearing on Tuesday that the government should continue collecting annual workforce demographic data, arguing that ending the practice would impair oversight of discrimination in hiring and employment. The hearing focused on an agency proposal to discontinue workforce demographic data collection, according to the report. Advocates said demographic and employment data are a key evidence source for identifying patterns that may not be visible through individual complaints alone, and for supporting investigations into discriminatory conduct. Researchers who study employment patterns also argued that the annual data collection has scientific value beyond enforcement, helping analysts understand how workplace demographics change over time and across industries. They said removing the dataset would reduce the ability to conduct robust research on disparities, including disparities that may emerge only when data are aggregated across employers and years. Civil rights groups at the hearing said the government’s decision on the proposal affects the practical ability to detect and address discrimination, including discrimination that can be difficult to prove case-by-case. They argued that maintaining an ongoing, standardized collection process supports due process by improving the evidentiary foundation available to investigators and, by extension, to parties involved in disputes. The advocates’ position was that a shift away from annual workforce demographic data would make discrimination enforcement less effective and less targeted. They also said the continuity of data matters because time-series comparisons help determine whether employment practices are changing, whether disparities widen or narrow, and whether employer workforces reflect broad patterns in discrimination risk. Opponents of continuing the practice, as characterized in the reporting, have argued that the government should end or revise the collection effort. The hearing testimony reflected a dispute over what level of data collection is necessary and what burdens it creates, with advocates urging the agency to preserve the collection while the proposal would move toward discontinuation. The next steps, based on the reporting, involve the agency’s consideration of the testimony as it weighs whether to proceed with ending workforce demographic data collection or to revise its approach. The proposal’s outcome is expected to determine whether the annual dataset continues to be available for researchers and for enforcement-related analysis.

.1.1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.00.0.0.0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0.0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0.1 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0