CPB Commissioner Rodney Scott says administration is not building a 30-foot wall at Big Bend National Park

Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott said Thursday that the Trump administration is not building a 30-foot wall at Big Bend National Park. Scott’s comments address reports and debate that the administration was planning a large, fixed wall in the remote area of the park along the border. Scott said the administration’s current efforts at Big Bend involve roadway construction and the use of barriers that he described as limited, rather than a single 30-foot structure. He made the point during an appearance where he outlined the scope of Customs and Border Protection’s work, according to the report. The dispute centers on how CBP is approaching physical infrastructure in a high-profile, environmentally sensitive location. Big Bend National Park is managed by the National Park Service, and any federal border-related construction there would require coordination across agencies and compliance with applicable environmental and land-management requirements. In that context, Scott’s characterization indicated that CBP is seeking to add or modify access and enforcement measures without building what critics and some observers described as a full-scale wall. Scott’s remarks also appear aimed at clarifying a specific measurement that has circulated in the public conversation. By stating that the administration is not pursuing a 30-foot wall, Scott shifted the discussion toward the practical form of enforcement structures that CBP is pursuing, including road work and smaller barrier components. Border enforcement infrastructure has become a central point of federal policy debate in recent years, with disagreements over construction scale, environmental impact, and the balance between technology, staffing, and physical barriers. In this case, Scott’s statement ties CBP’s Big Bend approach to a narrower set of construction steps, rather than a headline-grabbing megastructure. The report said Scott spoke Thursday about the administration’s plans at the park, describing them as involving “limited” barriers alongside roadway construction. It did not describe the exact dimensions or specifications of those barriers, or provide a timeline for completion of any roadway or barrier work. As the administration continues implementing border enforcement measures, the next factual steps will likely involve additional agency disclosures about what will be built at Big Bend, where it would be located, and how the scope of construction aligns with land-management constraints and permitting processes. Opposition groups and some members of Congress typically press for more detail and oversight in locations where environmental and public-interest concerns intersect with border security efforts.

keyFacts