THE APEX TIMES
Dan Scavino tells dismissed or sidelined federal officials to stop criticizing White House in public, The Hill reports
White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino posted a profanity-laced message aimed at officials who were fired or passed over, urging them to stop attacking the administration in media appearances, according to a report.
White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino posted a message on social media urging unnamed federal employees who were fired or passed over for jobs to stop criticizing the Trump administration in public, The Hill reported Thursday.
According to The Hill, Scavino’s post included profanity and took aim at individuals he identified as having been removed from roles or not selected for positions after working at the White House, while telling them to “take the L” and cease bashing the administration in the media. The report did not name the officials.
The Hill said Scavino’s remarks characterized the work those individuals were assigned as “a spectacularly s---ty job” and tied the criticism to media attacks rather than internal processes. The report framed the comments as an effort to push back against public criticism of the administration.
Scavino, a senior White House communications figure during the Trump administration, has been involved in White House messaging and public-facing statements. The Hill report, however, focused specifically on his post and the reaction from observers to what it described as an unusually direct rebuke of former staff.
The practical effect of Scavino’s comments, as described by The Hill, is to draw attention to how senior White House aides may respond to departures and internal disputes once staff members are no longer in government roles. It also underscores how public messaging can become part of the personnel narrative around who was hired, who was removed, and who was not selected.
No official disciplinary action or government policy tied to the post was described in The Hill report, and the report did not provide an official process outcome for the unnamed individuals referenced in Scavino’s message.
As of Thursday, the White House had not been cited in The Hill’s account with a separate official statement responding to the social media post’s content or discussing any formal guidance for fired or sidelined employees.
Why It Matters
- Senior White House aides using public social media to address personnel disputes can intensify scrutiny of how departures are handled and explained.
- The episode highlights how disputes between current leadership and former or sidelined staff can shift from internal disagreement to public messaging.
- If the conduct is tied to media criticism, it also raises questions about the boundary between speech in private employment and criticism of a sitting administration while not in office.
- The lack of an official White House follow-up or formal guidance, based on the reporting, may leave the practical impact limited to the message itself rather than any documented enforcement or process change.
Sources
- The Hill report on Dan Scavino rant
- White House Presidential Actions: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: President Trump Declassifies Intel on Foreign Election Interference and Deep
- White House Presidential Actions: President Trump Delivers the Largest Drop in Violent Crime in American History
- White House Presidential Actions: Presidential Message on the Anniversary of the Social Security Act
- White House Presidential Actions: Expanding Capabilities to Combat Transnational Cyber-Enabled Crime
- White House Presidential Actions:: Track the Trump Administration’s Relentless War on Fraud
Key Facts
- The Hill reported that White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino posted a profanity-laced message on social media aimed at unnamed officials.
- The report said Scavino referenced officials who were fired or passed over for jobs while working at or with the White House.
- The Hill said Scavino urged those individuals to stop criticizing the Trump administration in the media.
- The Hill reported Scavino used the phrase “take the L” and described the work as “a spectacularly s---ty job,” as reflected in the account.
- The Hill did not name the individuals referenced in the post.
- The report did not describe any White House policy or formal personnel action tied to the social media remarks.