Doja Cat Responds to Alleged AI-Generated Song Leaks, Says She Is ‘Disappointed’ in Fans

Doja Cat pushed back against the circulation of alleged leaked songs that she characterized as AI-generated material, telling fans she was “disappointed” that some people appeared to believe the tracks were real releases. The comments, reported by Billboard on June 24, came amid ongoing viral sharing of music content online that fans often scramble to interpret as new work from major artists.

According to the Billboard report, Doja Cat’s response framed the issue not only as misinformation, but as a quality and authenticity problem tied to AI technology. The artist reportedly used the phrase “F-k AI” while reacting to the posts, a line that underscored her rejection of AI-made tracks being presented as official music.

Billboard reported that the artist said she was “disappointed” in fans for thinking the circulating songs were legitimate. In the artist’s framing, at least some listeners had treated the leaked material as if it were authorized or professionally produced content from her catalog, even though it was circulating as alleged leaks tied to AI output rather than confirmed releases.

The episode highlights a growing pattern in online music culture, where unofficial tracks, remixes, or AI-generated imitations can spread quickly across social platforms and messaging apps. In many cases, fans rely on community chatter and visual or audio clues, sometimes arriving at conclusions before labels or distributors confirm what is actually authentic.

For artists and rights-holders, these waves of allegedly unauthorized material can create downstream confusion for listeners and for the promotional ecosystem that surrounds official releases. When AI-generated tracks are shared as leaks, they can influence what audiences expect next, complicate how artists communicate with fans, and add extra friction for teams tasked with monitoring and responding to misinformation.

Neither Billboard nor the reported account attributed any legal action in connection with the specific posts. The report focused on Doja Cat’s direct reaction to the circulating content and her message to fans about the authenticity of what they were consuming.

What happens next will likely depend on how quickly the circulating material can be slowed or removed by platforms and how clearly the artist’s representatives choose to address the authenticity of similar posts in the future. For now, Doja Cat’s public comments serve as a direct, artist-led report to fans that the viral tracks should not be treated as legitimate releases.