Durbin says acting Attorney General Blanche called DOJ “anti-weaponization” funding a “mistake” ahead of nomination hearing

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told him the Justice Department “anti-weaponization” fund the Trump administration requested was “a mistake” during what Durbin described as a courtesy meeting held before the panel’s Wednesday hearing reviewing Blanche’s nomination to lead the Justice Department.

Durbin’s comments were framed as a response to controversy over the administration’s funding proposal, which has drawn criticism from Democrats and civil liberties advocates. Durbin said Blanche’s characterization came directly from Blanche in their meeting, according to Durbin’s account of the exchange.

The hearing is expected to focus on Blanche’s role overseeing federal law enforcement and the department’s internal operations, including the use of appropriated resources. Durbin’s remarks add a new dispute point about the fund’s stated purpose and how senior DOJ leadership views it.

The Hill reported the figure at the center of the dispute as $1.776 billion for the “anti-weaponization” effort. The report did not indicate whether DOJ or the administration has publicly issued a formal rebuttal or revised budget framing in response to Durbin’s account of Blanche’s comments.

Blanche is set to face questions from senators on oversight, department priorities, and the degree to which DOJ resources will be used for cases and enforcement. The exchange described by Durbin also underscores the political fight over how DOJ should handle internal reviews, investigations, and any efforts perceived as targeting political institutions or opponents.

It remains unclear from the information available here whether the administration or DOJ has issued an official statement addressing Durbin’s claim that Blanche called the funding request “a mistake,” or whether DOJ’s budget justifications will change ahead of committee action or floor consideration.

The committee hearing is scheduled to continue the nomination process, with any subsequent committee vote and full Senate consideration dependent on the record compiled during questioning and any follow-up documents DOJ provides.