THE APEX TIMES
Fabless-only semiconductor ETF gains 54% in 2026 while skipping Intel
The VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF has surged year to date, following an index-style mandate focused on chip designers rather than chip makers, leaving Intel out.
A semiconductor exchange-traded fund has raced higher in 2026, gaining more than 54% year to date even though it does not hold one of the industry’s best-known chip names: Intel.
Through July 2, 2026, the VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF, traded in the U.S. as SMHX, was up 54.22% year to date, according to the market report that highlighted the fund’s unusual roster for a sector widely associated with large manufacturers.
The key to that performance profile is the fund’s definition of what counts as a “fabless” semiconductor company. “Fabless” companies design chips but do not manufacture them in-house, instead relying on outside manufacturing partners.
Under the strategy described in the report, SMHX is structured to target fabless chip designers and to avoid holding semiconductor manufacturers by mandate. In practical terms, that approach means it is built to own companies such as large designers, while excluding firms that primarily manufacture chips.
Intel, traded on Nasdaq under the ticker INTC, is one of the sector’s most recognizable vertically integrated chip makers, so the ETF’s fabless-only tilt effectively keeps it out. The report framed this as a deliberate gap rather than an omission caused by portfolio selection.
The headline implication is that investors using a sector ETF like SMHX are expressing a specific view about the semiconductor value chain. By focusing on chip design rather than chip production, the fund’s returns can diverge meaningfully from broader semiconductor baskets that include both designers and manufacturers.
The report did not provide further detail on SMHX’s exact holdings, concentration, or how it defines “fabless” in edge cases, such as companies with mixed operating models or manufacturing partnerships that vary by product line.
For investors and market-watchers, the next question is how persistent the gap becomes as chip industry expectations shift. If market leadership continues to favor design-focused companies over manufacturers, SMHX’s performance could stay unusually disconnected from funds that hold Intel and other makers.
Why It Matters
- SMHX illustrates how ETF mandates can cause large performance differences within the same broad sector.
- A fabless-only approach can shift exposure away from vertically integrated chip makers, potentially changing how investors transmit expectations into prices.
- The divergence can also influence trading and sentiment around excluded names like Intel, especially during periods when design leaders outperform.
Sources
Key Facts
- The VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) was reported up 54.22% year to date through July 2, 2026.
- The ETF’s approach centers on “fabless” semiconductor companies, which design chips and outsource manufacturing.
- The fund is described as avoiding semiconductor manufacturers by mandate.
- Intel (INTC) was highlighted as not being owned by the ETF despite being a recognizable semiconductor name.
- The observation was framed as part of SMHX’s strategy rather than a temporary portfolio decision.
Technology Related
Netflix faces fresh scrutiny into its Q3 report as shares slide about 25% in 2026
With third-quarter results due after the bell, Netflix is entering earnings week with its stock down roughly a quarter for the year so far, after taking steps to address investor concerns in recent days.
Amazon shares rise after Morgan Stanley cites five catalysts and lifts its price target
The stock gained in early trading after Morgan Stanley reiterated Amazon as a top pick and raised its outlook, pointing to multiple potential drivers for growth.
Amazon shares rise after Morgan Stanley calls AMZN a “top pick,” as investors weigh Meta’s AI model Muse
The move came amid broader market attention on generative AI, including investor concerns tied to Meta’s Muse.
Intel tops chip-stock gainers as investors refocus on AI exposure
A broad rebound in semiconductor shares Monday highlighted renewed investor appetite for companies tied to artificial intelligence, with Intel leading the move among peers.
Wall Street remains upbeat on Netflix, but “average buy” masks a tougher question
A new market recap says Netflix’s average brokerage recommendation is effectively a Buy, even as observers question whether consensus optimism can be as useful as it looks.
Nvidia appears to have held up during a new AI-market downturn, with Jensen Huang pointing to a possible explanation
A market bounce for Nvidia amid broader AI volatility is prompting renewed attention to what investors think matters most in the current chip cycle, and what the company’s CEO believes is driving the divide.
Nvidia weighs potential expansion into Reflection AI as it cites a cash cushion and valuation narrative
A report tied to the Financial Times says Nvidia has opened early discussions about acquiring the AI startup Reflection AI or making a larger investment, as investors focus on the company’s reported cash levels and whether its valuation looks less demanding than in prior cycles.
Apple’s stock has beaten the S&P 500, but investors are debating whether a 35x valuation is pricing in too much growth
A Yahoo Finance analysis points to Apple’s relative market outperformance while questioning whether the market’s earnings multiple is ahead of the company’s near-term growth prospects, especially in iPhone demand.
Meta testing Broadcom’s next-generation co-packaged optics switch, aiming at 1 million port-hours
A company testing effort described by industry media suggests Meta is evaluating a compact co-packaged optics (CPO) design built on Broadcom’s Tomahawk 6-Davisson platform, with production expectations tied to high reliability targets.
Meta and Alphabet AI spend raises a tougher question for investors in GOOGL shares
A new market analysis points to a gap between Alphabet’s AI investment pace and how investors may be pricing the benefits, especially compared with Meta’s approach to artificial intelligence.