Florida, West Virginia and Louisiana AGs subpoena Anthony Fauci in joint COVID-19 probe

Three state attorneys general subpoenaed Anthony Fauci, the former White House chief medical adviser, as part of a joint investigation into what they characterize as his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a report published Wednesday.

Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody (R) joined with West Virginia Attorney General John McCuskey (R) and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill (R) in issuing the subpoenas, the outlet reported. The attorneys general described the investigation as a multistate probe tied to the former top federal health official’s pandemic role.

The subpoenas are being handled as part of a coordinated state review that, according to the report, targets the information Fauci provided during the pandemic and the actions taken during that period. The report did not describe in detail which specific documents or communications are being sought, or the exact deadlines attached to the requests.

The move is part of a broader pattern of state-led investigations into the federal COVID-19 response, including efforts aimed at obtaining records held by or associated with senior public health officials. State attorneys general have argued that investigations can illuminate how pandemic guidance was developed and implemented, while also probing whether laws were followed and whether parties complied with applicable duties.

For Fauci, the subpoenas raise questions about scope and enforceability, including which records may be covered by privileges or other protections and what responses are required by state subpoena authority. The report did not indicate whether Fauci plans to challenge the subpoenas in court or whether negotiations over scope and production timelines are underway.

The practical effect of the subpoenas will depend on the breadth of the requests, the volume of material sought, and the timing of any compliance or legal disputes. If the requests lead to document production or sworn testimony, the states may use the resulting record to support further legal and policy steps, subject to what is ultimately obtained and any litigation over access.

The attorneys general’s next steps will likely include reviewing responses for evidentiary value and determining whether additional subpoenas, depositions, or referrals are warranted. Any disputes over the requests could move into state or federal court, where courts would address the legality of the subpoena demands and any asserted defenses.