Kamala Harris, in media appearance, argues for Supreme Court changes and shifting Electoral College if Democrats control Congress

The former vice president told Keke Palmer that the popular vote should “matter,” and renewed calls for statehood for Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, while discussing possible changes to the Supreme Court’s composition.

By The Apex Times Newsroom2 min readAI-assisted Apex article

In an appearance discussed in a report published October 14, former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris called for potential changes to the Supreme Court and for adjustments to how presidential electors are selected, linking those ideas to a scenario in which Democrats regain control of Congress.

According to the report, Harris made the remarks during an interview with media personality Keke Palmer. The article says Harris argued that the “popular vote” should be decisive and that it “has to matter,” framing her position as a response to how the Electoral College functions under the current system.

The report also states that Harris discussed a proposal to alter the Supreme Court’s structure, describing her views as support for “packing” the Court. The piece ties the concept to the leverage Democrats could have if they were able to pass legislation in Congress that would change the Court’s composition.

Beyond presidential elections and the Court, the report says Harris renewed calls for statehood for Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. The article presents those proposals as part of a broader agenda for federal political status changes that would require congressional and presidential action to implement.

Harris’s comments were reported as conditional, depending on party control in Congress. The report characterizes her approach as using potential legislative authority to reshape major federal institutions, including the Court and the mechanics of presidential elections, rather than describing immediate policy changes under current congressional leadership.

The practical pathway for the ideas Harris raised would depend on congressional approval of any statutory changes, as well as how courts interpret any resulting alterations to federal election administration or judicial structure. The report does not identify specific bills, draft language, or a timeline for legislative drafting or hearings.

Why It Matters

If lawmakers pursued changes to the Supreme Court’s composition, the policy would likely face legal challenges centered on constitutional structure and separation-of-powers concerns.
Adjusting how presidential electors are selected would affect national election administration and how votes translate into electoral outcomes, potentially requiring changes to federal and state election laws.
Statehood proposals for Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico would require congressional action and could raise issues related to congressional representation, budget treatment, and federal-state jurisdiction.
Because the report describes conditional proposals, the next step would be whether any members of Congress translate the statements into draft legislation or hearings.

Sources

Key Facts

A report dated October 14 says Kamala Harris made remarks in an interview with Keke Palmer.
The report says Harris argued the popular vote should “matter” in presidential elections.
The report says Harris called for “packing” the Supreme Court and linked it to Democrats regaining control of Congress.
The report says Harris renewed calls for statehood for Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico.
The report presents Harris’s ideas as conditional on congressional control rather than describing an enacted change.