Maryland Gov. Wes Moore says he is “very concerned” President Trump could interfere in fall midterms

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said he is “very concerned” that President Donald Trump will use the power of the federal government to thwart the midterm elections this fall. Moore made the comment in the context of the remaining months of Trump’s term, according to a report from The Washington Times Politics on Aug. 1, 2026.

Moore’s statement centers on the prospect of federal actions affecting state election processes. While the report does not detail specific steps Moore alleges the administration could take, it frames his concern around the use of federal authority to shape or disrupt the elections.

The remarks come as candidates and states prepare for the 2026 midterm cycle, with election administration responsibilities largely carried out at the state and local level. In such systems, federal involvement can still arise through enforcement of civil rights, regulatory oversight in certain areas, and the provision of federal resources, though the report does not identify any particular policy or legal initiative tied to Moore’s concern.

Moore’s comments also reflect a dispute over the proper boundaries of federal power during election periods. Moore characterized his worry in general terms, saying the federal government could be used to interfere with the vote this fall, rather than pointing to a specific complaint filed or action taken.

The statement is likely to resonate with broader debates over government authority and election integrity as voters head toward polling and early voting windows. However, the report provides no additional confirmed facts about alleged interference plans, specific agencies involved, or any pending legal proceedings.

Moore’s remarks do not indicate that Maryland is taking a particular court or administrative action in response, according to the information in the Aug. 1 report. His intervention instead functions as a public warning about potential misuse of federal influence, setting up the possibility of further statements from election officials and federal counterparts if additional details emerge.

As the midterm campaign season develops, the practical impact of Moore’s concern will depend on whether the federal government takes concrete, election-related measures and whether any such actions are challenged through the courts or election administration channels. For now, the record available from the report supports Moore’s expressed concern rather than an identified, confirmed act of interference.