Pakistan prime minister says U.S. and Iran have reached “final, agreed-upon text” for a deal

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the United States and Iran have reached “final, agreed-upon text” for a deal that could be signed soon, according to a report from CNBC Politics on June 12, 2026.

Sharif’s remarks, as reported, were tied to comments from a senior Trump administration official who said a final text had been agreed and that signing could occur shortly. The report also described recent days of conflicting statements from the two sides regarding whether negotiations were nearing completion.

The reported sequence places the latest development within a period in which U.S. and Iranian officials offered different assessments of progress. In that context, Sharif’s statement represents a new, externally attributed point of reference on the negotiation status rather than a document release or formal treaty text made public.

The record available from the CNBC report does not identify the text itself, the specific authorities under which it would be implemented, or whether the agreement is contingent on additional steps such as inspections, sanctions actions, or congressional review. It also does not specify whether the deal would take the form of a formal treaty, an executive agreement, or another instrument under existing U.S. policy authorities.

While the report characterizes the agreement as close to finalization, it does not describe the operational timelines for any potential sanctions relief, enforcement changes, or verification mechanisms. Those details matter because Iran-related U.S. measures typically involve complex legal and regulatory processes across multiple agencies and, in some cases, compliance requirements for third parties.

The next steps, as far as can be determined from the reported information, would be to confirm whether the “final, agreed-upon text” is officially published or submitted to relevant U.S. institutions and Iranian counterparts, and whether any implementation schedule is linked to verification or third-party compliance milestones.

Until those elements are publicly clarified, the “final text” claim functions primarily as a procedural update on whether negotiators have converged on an agreed draft, not as an established, fully implemented change in law or sanctions posture.