Stephanie Grisham, former Trump White House press secretary, seeks restraining order against Rep. Max Miller, report says

The filing seeks court protection after Grisham previously accused Rep. Max Miller of abusive conduct, according to a report published Monday.

By The Apex Times Newsroom2 min readAI-assisted Apex article

Stephanie Grisham, the former Trump White House press secretary, has filed to seek a restraining order against U.S. Rep. Max Miller, according to a report published by the New York Post on August 4, 2026. The outlet said the request was made Monday.

Grisham is described in the report as pursuing court relief based on allegations she previously made against Miller. The report characterizes Grisham’s earlier accusations as involving abuse and says she is now asking a court to intervene with a restraining order.

The report does not, in the information provided for this story, specify the jurisdiction, the court, or the specific conditions requested in the restraining order. It also does not provide confirmed details such as hearing dates, whether a temporary order was granted, or what exact conduct Grisham is seeking to prevent going forward.

The filing comes as Miller remains a sitting member of the U.S. House of Representatives. Because the restraining-order request is a court matter, the practical effect of such an order would depend on what a judge authorizes, including whether any temporary protections are issued pending a full consideration of the request.

Grisham’s request, as described by the New York Post, frames the matter as one requiring judicial enforcement rather than a political process. Restraining orders typically operate through court-ordered limits and potential consequences for violating those limits, but the specific enforcement mechanism and scope would be determined by the court order itself.

Under U.S. legal process, requests for restraining orders generally require the moving party to demonstrate grounds for the relief sought, and the responding party typically has an opportunity to contest the allegations and the requested protections. Without access to the actual court filing and any resulting order, the allegations remain claims presented to the court rather than findings of fact.

As of now, the only confirmed element in the record provided for this story is that the New York Post reported Grisham’s request for a restraining order against Miller on Monday and referenced her earlier accusations. Further verification would require reviewing the court docket, the petition itself, and any subsequent orders or filings in the case.

Why It Matters

If a restraining order is issued, it would create enforceable court-ordered limits affecting a sitting member of Congress and would be governed by the specific terms of the order.
Restraining-order proceedings typically include procedural steps such as a review of the petition and opportunities to respond, making docket entries and court findings central to what is ultimately enforced.
The case would shift a dispute between private parties or allegations into the judiciary, where outcomes can determine protections, travel or contact limits, and potential compliance obligations.
Because the practical scope depends on what a judge signs, confirming the actual court filing and order is necessary before drawing conclusions about legal findings or enforcement.

Sources

Key Facts

The New York Post reported on August 4, 2026 that Stephanie Grisham sought a restraining order against U.S. Rep. Max Miller.
The report says the filing was made Monday.
The report links the request to Grisham’s earlier allegations against Miller, which it characterizes as involving abuse.
The provided materials do not include the court, jurisdiction, or specific terms requested in the restraining order.
The report does not confirm whether the court granted any temporary protections, scheduled a hearing, or issued an order.