THE APEX TIMES
Survey by Booz Allen Finds Federal Agencies Accelerating Agentic AI, but Security and Trust Lag
More than half of federal IT and cybersecurity decision makers say their agencies are already deploying or piloting AI systems that can act autonomously, but fewer than one-third express high confidence they can do so securely, according to a new Booz Allen survey.
Federal agencies are moving quickly toward “agentic” artificial intelligence, systems designed not just to generate responses but to take actions, yet a sizable trust and security gap remains, according to a new survey released by Booz Allen Hamilton.
The survey, published July 21, is featured in the latest issue of Velocity, Booz Allen’s ongoing publication focused on emerging technology and mission innovation. It examines what government cybersecurity leaders see as opportunities and risks as autonomous AI enters IT and cyber operations.
Among more than 100 federal IT and cybersecurity decision makers surveyed, 58% said their agencies have already deployed or are piloting AI agents. However, only 28% said they have high confidence in their ability to deploy those systems securely, suggesting a widening divide between adoption plans and governance readiness.
Booz Allen said the survey also points to continued concerns about adversaries using AI-enabled cyber capabilities. Seventy-nine percent of respondents reported they are “very” or “extremely concerned” that opponents could use AI to accelerate cyberattacks against their agencies over the next 12 to 18 months.
To address the concerns, Booz Allen said the Velocity edition lays out a systems-level approach to deploying agentic AI securely, spanning the full AI lifecycle rather than treating security as a one-time checklist. The report emphasizes identity governance, continuous monitoring, red teaming, formal validation, and the use of zero trust principles.
Identity governance refers to managing who or what is allowed to access systems and data, including permissions for AI-driven workflows. Continuous monitoring involves tracking performance and behavior after deployment, while red teaming and formal validation are designed to test an AI system against adversarial scenarios and to confirm it meets defined requirements. Zero trust principles shift security away from implicit trust inside networks and toward ongoing verification.
Booz Allen said the survey was conducted in partnership with Market Connections and involved an online survey of 105 federal government decision makers and influencers involved in IT and cybersecurity strategy. The fieldwork was conducted in April 2026.
For Booz Allen, the survey is positioned as both a warning and a planning tool for organizations wrestling with how to gain operational benefits from agentic AI without losing control of what those systems do and how they can be held accountable. The company described the underlying theme as a challenge for cybersecurity leaders: harnessing speed and autonomy while ensuring security and accountability.
Still, the release does not detail what specific agentic AI systems are being piloted, how agencies define “high confidence,” or what security gaps respondents are most concerned about. It also does not break out results by agency type, mission area, or procurement status, limiting how far the findings can be used to pinpoint where implementation risk is concentrated.
Looking ahead, the key question for federal adopters will be whether security measures such as identity governance and continuous monitoring keep pace with expanding deployments. As agencies push agentic tools from pilot into production, Booz Allen’s survey suggests the deciding factor may be governance maturity, including validated controls, testing discipline, and ongoing verification of AI behavior in operational environments.
Why It Matters
- The gap between deployment and security confidence suggests agencies may need faster progress on governance, testing, and operational controls to match adoption timelines.
- High concern about AI-accelerated cyber threats indicates pressure to treat agentic AI as both a defensive opportunity and a risk factor in threat models.
- If agencies proceed with autonomy, demand may rise for security frameworks that can demonstrate accountability and validated performance rather than relying on vendor promises.
Sources
Key Facts
- Booz Allen released a survey on agentic AI adoption in federal IT and cybersecurity environments.
- 58% of 105 federal IT and cybersecurity decision makers surveyed said their agencies have deployed or are piloting AI agents.
- 28% said they have high confidence in deploying AI agents securely.
- 79% of respondents reported being “very” or “extremely” concerned about AI-enabled adversaries accelerating cyberattacks in the next 12 to 18 months.
- The survey was fielded in April 2026 and conducted with Market Connections.
- Booz Allen said its accompanying Velocity edition highlights security controls across the agentic AI lifecycle, including identity governance, continuous monitoring, red teaming, formal validation, and zero trust.
Defense Related
Boeing moves toward talks with Cathay Pacific on potential wide-body order of up to 50 jets
A reported discussion between Boeing and Cathay Pacific outlines renewed competition in the long-haul wide-body market, with Airbus also reportedly in the negotiation mix.
GE Aerospace and Lockheed Martin headline contrasting growth narratives, as investors weigh defense backlog against commercial aviation demand
A new Yahoo Finance comparison pits GE Aerospace’s rising commercial outlook against Lockheed Martin’s defense spending backdrop, pointing to how investors may value backlog, guidance, and end-market momentum going into late 2026.
Boeing shares slide after Barclays flags upside, following another drop from January highs
Boeing’s stock has fallen nearly 26% from its January closing high as Barclays reiterated a bullish view, setting a $300 price target that the firm said would imply about 60% upside from its October 15 close. The company’s latest reported quarter also showed revenue growth, according to the market report.
Boeing slips back below $200 as strike deadline looms, after new contracts are signed
Shares of Boeing fell back under the $200 level ahead of a labor-related deadline, even as the company finalized new contracts that could help stabilize its near-term outlook.
Lockheed Martin or RTX? The dividend case depends on balance-sheet strength and business mix
Both Lockheed Martin and RTX lifted their full-year outlook in the same July window, but investors weighing dividend durability are looking past the headlines toward how each company generates and protects cash during a budget freeze or a market shock.
RBC cuts Boeing price target to $235, citing continuing uncertainty in U.S. defense budgets
The investment bank lowered its target to $235 from $265 while keeping an “Outperform” rating, pointing to lingering uncertainty around defense spending as a potential drag on sentiment for Boeing shares.