Titans offseason comes into focus as Mike Borgonzi’s roster plan nears completion

The Tennessee Titans’ offseason is entering its final stretch, and the internal theme, as characterized in a recent team-focused review, is that the major roster building is largely done. The view is that the Titans can afford to take a measured approach, likely using contract extensions rather than an aggressive spending spree to fine-tune the group before training camp.

The assessment is tied to the work of Titans general manager Mike Borgonzi, who is described as wanting to avoid becoming a “big spender” on long-duration free-agent deals. That matters in roster construction because long contracts can limit flexibility, especially when a team is still balancing immediate needs with the longer-term salary-cap picture. In this framing, Tennessee’s room to maneuver in the offseason was a key starting point, even if the end goal is not maximal spending.

At the same time, the Titans have not been characterized as standing pat. The offseason, according to the review, included enough movement to address a “ton of needs,” with the confidence that those decisions improved the floor of the roster. In practical terms, raising the baseline usually means adding players or capabilities that keep the team competitive across more scenarios, rather than relying on a narrow set of outcomes.

Because the roster is described as “pretty much set,” the most likely remaining activity would be smaller moves that generally do not reshape the structure of the team. The expectation is that a couple of contract extensions could be completed between now and training camp. Extensions often serve two purposes, preserving continuity for players the team values and reducing uncertainty as the start of the season approaches.

The Titans’ offseason logic also reflects how teams manage attention and resources during the critical pre-camp window. Even with cap space available at the start of the offseason, the choice of how to use it can define the roster’s stability. If Tennessee’s approach is indeed to be selective, it suggests a preference for targeted improvements now and keeping future options open, rather than locking into multiple large, long-term commitments.

For fans, the most tangible indicators of whether this offseason plan fully lands will show up as camp approaches. Extensions, in particular, can report the organization’s priorities and how it views the current core’s readiness. How the Titans’ first-team units look early in camp, and whether key positional groups appear settled rather than in flux, will help confirm if the “floor-raising” goal is translating into on-field form.

With no further public detail in the review beyond the broader plan, some specifics remain to be confirmed through official team announcements and subsequent offseason actions. The next steps to watch are any contract extension reports and how Tennessee’s coaching staff evaluates the assembled roster during organized team activities and early practices. If the team’s offseason truly is close to complete, the camp narrative may shift from who they signed or restructured to how quickly the group develops chemistry and roles.

Ultimately, the value of a measured offseason is clarity. A team can be capped by poor fit or by excessive cost, or it can benefit from a roster assembled to function well in its intended system. For the Titans, the offseason grade being discussed hinges on that idea, that the front office used its resources to solve pressing needs without tying the franchise’s future in the process.