Todd Monken and the Browns continue to sort out the quarterback depth chart, with Dillon Gabriel and Taylen Green the lingering question

The Cleveland Browns appear to have a clearer picture for their top two quarterbacks, but the group at the next level is not settled yet. Yahoo Sports reported that offensive coordinator Todd Monken is continuing to “wrestle somewhat” with the fates of Dillon Gabriel and Taylen Green, suggesting the Browns are approaching a decision point for who will occupy the most valuable roles behind the starters.

In an NFL training-camp environment, the top of the depth chart tends to be decided first because it affects installation of the offensive game plan. Monken’s work as coordinator is centered on timing, decision-making speed, and pre-snap understanding. Once the Browns have the primary and immediate backup quarterback identified, the staff can build the weekly preparation plan around them. The remaining question, as framed in the report, is what the quarterback room looks like after that first tier.

The report’s phrasing matters because it implies the Browns do not view the Gabriel and Green situation as a simple “either-or” matter that has already been resolved. Instead, it points to an ongoing evaluation process in which the staff is still weighing how each quarterback fits the offense as the preseason workload accumulates.

That kind of decision typically rests on more than arm talent. For a coordinator like Monken, key considerations include how quickly a quarterback can process coverage and route adjustments, how cleanly they can execute play-action and tempo calls, and whether their mechanics translate reliably at full speed when the offense is mixing run concepts with pass protection adjustments.

Dillon Gabriel and Taylen Green, both positioned in the discussion as candidates for clarity within the QB depth chart, represent the Browns’ need to stabilize the rest of the room. In practical terms, that means determining who gives Cleveland the best chance to run the offense as designed if the starter or primary backup is unavailable, and who can handle late-game or high-leverage moments. The “decision time” language in the report indicates that Cleveland is trending toward narrowing the options rather than keeping the competition open indefinitely.

For Browns fans, the most important watch point is not just who wins a job on paper, but how the staff organizes quarterback usage in practices and preseason-style sessions. The Browns can learn a lot by how often each player is asked to execute the full playbook, whether they’re given equal opportunities in the same scripted periods, and how the offense functions when the rotation turns over.

Because this report is based on Monday’s coverage and does not cite an official team statement in the information available here, the specifics of any timetable or final outcomes should be treated cautiously. Still, the direction is clear: Cleveland’s front office and coaching staff are nearing an internal conclusion about the next tier of quarterback roles.

The broader takeaway is that Monken’s quarterback planning will continue to shape Cleveland’s offensive rhythm. Once the Browns resolve the lingering question around Gabriel and Green, they can lock in preparation patterns for the season, reduce uncertainty for the rest of the offense, and move forward with a more consistent quarterback-driven identity.