Trump and Pakistan Prime Minister Say US-Iran Agreement Would Reopen Strait of Hormuz, End More Than Three Months of War

U.S. President Donald Trump and Pakistan’s prime minister said Sunday that the United States and Iran had reached a war-ending agreement, with the stated goals of reopening the Strait of Hormuz and ending more than three months of fighting. The announcement was made in tandem by the two leaders during a period of heightened attention on maritime security and regional stability tied to one of the world’s most important shipping routes.

In the report published Sunday by The Washington Times, Trump characterized the deal as an agreement reached to end the war and restore access through the Strait of Hormuz. The prime minister of Pakistan was also cited as saying the arrangement would serve both as a cessation of hostilities and as a return of shipping operations in and around the strait, where disruptions can affect global energy markets and commercial delivery schedules.

The Strait of Hormuz links the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea and is a chokepoint for crude oil and petroleum products shipped to international markets. Any closure or restriction has immediate implications for transport, insurance and logistics costs, and for the ability of regional partners and commercial entities to operate normally. The report framed the agreement as directly tied to reopening the route, rather than only to a political understanding.

The reported timeframe for the fighting referenced in the announcement was “more than three months.” However, the report did not outline the operational terms for ending the conflict, such as the timing of any ceasefire, the scope of sanctions relief, verification steps, or enforcement mechanisms. It also did not specify what Iranian, U.S., or third-party actions would be required to reopen navigation safely and consistently through the strait.

A key practical question is how the agreement will be implemented and monitored, particularly given the operational complexity of maritime movements in conflict-adjacent waters. Reopening the strait would typically require arrangements that address naval and aerial security concerns, commercial guidance for vessels, and coordination among regional authorities. The report did not provide such specifics or cite a formal document establishing the timeline.

For Pakistan, the comments underscore the role of diplomatic outreach by regional partners when tensions rise between major states. Pakistan’s interest in the region is linked to broader stability concerns and to the downstream effects of shipping disruptions and energy price volatility on domestic and regional economies.

The next steps, based on what was reported, hinge on whether the parties release written terms and implementation schedules and whether additional officials confirm the agreement’s structure. Until such details are publicly established, investors, shipping stakeholders, and governments are likely to continue relying on official navigational and security advisories while waiting for confirmation that hostilities are truly paused and the strait’s accessibility can be restored reliably.