UFC publishes official judges scorecards for Kape vs. Horiguchi at Fight Night in Las Vegas

UFC has published the official judges scorecards for UFC Fight Night: Kape vs Horiguchi, giving fans a round-by-round look at how each bout was evaluated inside the scoring system. The scores are posted alongside the results of the evening’s fights, and they are intended as the definitive record of each judge’s perspective during the event at Meta APEX in Las Vegas on June 20, 2026.

The headliner matchup, Kape vs Horiguchi, was framed by UFC as a flyweight rematch that has been years in the making. UFC’s own event preview emphasized how rare the timing is for a second meeting to happen, and the scorecards add a granular layer to that storyline by showing which rounds landed with each judge and how the fight played in the eyes of the officials.

For viewers, the value of official scorecards goes beyond deciding close affairs in public. They also offer a factual baseline for how judges interpreted factors that are difficult to see consistently in real time, such as effective striking output, grappling control, and the pace of rounds that can swing momentum even when a fighter remains in striking range.

UFC’s post also functions as a searchable reference point for future discussion about the flyweight division. When fighters and their camps revisit fights, they often focus on why certain rounds were scored for or against them. Having every round recorded by the judges helps strip away guesswork, especially for bouts that hinge on exchanges that can look different depending on angle and timing.

The scorecards publication covers every fight on the card, not only the featured bout. That matters because undercard contests can set up subsequent matchups, and judging patterns can influence how matchups are discussed after the fact, including which styles tend to earn more consistent round-to-round support from the panels.

It is worth noting, however, that official scorecards do not capture all the context behind a fight. They reflect judging totals and round allocations, but they do not replace the broader fight narrative that comes from corner instructions, tactical adjustments, and what each fighter did between the moments that end up defining a round. In other words, the record clarifies decisions without fully explaining them.

With UFC’s round-by-round scoring now on the public record, the next question for the flyweight landscape is how the two sides and the division respond to the official picture of the night. Fans will likely revisit the round allocations to understand whether the fight settled into one fighter’s rhythm, whether it required a late rally, or whether momentum changed hand by hand across the distance.