
THE APEX TIMES
Yankees look to the offseason after an ALDS Game 3 that changed the conversation
A New York Daily News columnist, relayed by Yahoo Sports, argues the Yankees need to treat their ALDS Game 3 struggles as a roster-planning lesson, with Jazz Chisholm Jr. and Trent Grisham standing out as potential free-agent decisions and Ryan McMahon representing a costlier call because of his 2027 commitment.
The Yankees are turning toward the offseason with a blunt offseason assignment after their ALDS Game 3. As Gary Phillips wrote, the low points from a short postseason run are often where the most useful internal reviews begin, especially when fans and front office both start looking for answers in roster construction and personnel decisions rather than one-off performances.
In Phillips’ assessment, the Yankees’ planning should directly connect to specific roster choices that defined the Game 3 experience, including how the team thinks about its infield and outfield mix moving forward. His focus for potential change is centered on Jazz Chisholm Jr. and Trent Grisham as names whose free-agent paths could define the team’s next chapter.
Chisholm Jr. and Grisham, in Phillips’ view, represent “simple enough” decisions if the Yankees conclude it is time to move in a different direction at those spots. The underlying logic is roster clarity, not just short-term regret. If the postseason revealed a mismatch between role and outcome, the offseason becomes the moment to correct it, even if that means accepting the emotional cost of letting familiar players depart.
Ryan McMahon, however, complicates the math. Phillips notes McMahon is still under contract for 2027, and that cutting ties now would require the Yankees to absorb $16 million. That figure turns a baseball question into an accounting one, because the team’s willingness to change fast is constrained by contract structure and the cost of disengaging from a player before the intended timeline.
Phillips also points to a parallel financial storyline: the Yankees’ payroll flexibility for 2027 and beyond could improve if the DJ LeMahieu contract is now at least off the books. That is the kind of detail that matters for a club like the Yankees, where offseason maneuvering often depends on whether the team can create meaningful space without relying exclusively on internal promotion.
For Yankees fans, the immediate takeaway is that the offseason debate is likely to include both baseball fit and financial feasibility. The next step is watching which names the club prioritizes, because free agency can change the roster quickly, while contract obligations like the one Phillips cites for McMahon can slow decisions even when the organization agrees with the conclusion that change is needed.
Why It Matters
- The ALDS is where roster weaknesses become visible quickly, and teams often translate those lessons into offseason lineup and role changes.
- Player decisions tied to free agency can reshape the Yankees’ core, while players with multi-year commitments can limit how fast the roster can be rebuilt.
- Contract costs, such as Phillips’ $16 million estimate for McMahon, can influence whether the Yankees pursue a clean break or gradual adjustment.
- The Yankees’ ability to create financial room can determine how many options they have, particularly if departures are paired with targeted additions.
Key Facts
- Gary Phillips, writing for the New York Daily News and republished by Yahoo Sports, argues the Yankees should use their ALDS Game 3 as a lesson for offseason roster decisions.
- Phillips highlights Jazz Chisholm Jr. and Trent Grisham as potential free-agent decisions, suggesting the Yankees could allow them to walk.
- Phillips says Ryan McMahon remains under contract for 2027.
- Phillips writes that cutting Ryan McMahon now would mean eating $16 million.
- Phillips also notes the DJ LeMahieu contract is now at least off the books, potentially affecting roster planning.